Share this post on:

T, despite absent histopathologic findings characteristic for CMV disease in target organs, IE1 gene expression was detectable in the spleen of half of the latently infected allogeneic HCT recipients at time of analysis and that those animals demonstrated more severe GVHD injury than IE-1 negative recipients. Interestingly, organ changes of CMV latently infected but IE-1 negative recipients did not differ from allogeneic non-CMV controls, suggesting that clinically relevant CMV reactivation can be identified by the expression of IE-1, potentially promoting GVHD severity.CMV and GVHDFigure 4. Lung injury after allogeneic HCT. Animals were transplanted as described in Peptide M Materials and Methods. (A) Lung pathology was semiquantitatively assessed on day +100. Data are expressed as mean 6 SEM. n = 11 (mock), 7 MCMV IE1(2) and MCMV IE1(+), respectively. (B)+(C) Example of histopathological changes (H E stain, magnification: 2006) for (B) mock (normal lung tissue without or with minimal periluminal inflammation around airways and blood vessels, no parenchymal pneumonitis and (C) IE1(+): periluminal inflammation around airways and blood vessels but no major parenchymal pneumonitis. (D ) Total BALF cellularity and CD4+ and CD8+ BAL T cells at day +100 after HCT. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0061841.gPrior studies have demonstrated that lungs and liver are the true sites of MCMV latency and recurrence [47], [14], [26]. Consistently, differences in pulmonary and hepatic, but not colonic pathology were seen in our model. Further, CMV has been associated with the development of obliterative bronchiolitis as a form of lung allograft rejection after solid organ transplan-tation and has been linked to Felypressin supplier chronic GVHD after HCT, respectively [48] 49]. Pulmonary findings in our model are not characteristic for obliterative bronchiolitis, though they are consistent with changes seen in chronic lung injury of HCT recipients [50], and it is suggestive, that CMV reactivation indeedFigure 5. Hepatic GVHD after allogeneic HCT. Animals were transplanted as described in Materials and Methods. (A) Hepatic GVHD pathology was semiquantitatively assessed on day +100. Data are expressed as mean 6 SEM. n = 11 (mock), 7 (MCMV IE1 (2)) and (MCMV IE1 (+)), respectively. (B ) Example of histopathological changes (H E stain, magnification: 1006) of the liver showing portal tract with moderate lymphocytic inflammation in IE1(+).mock. (D) Colonic GVHD pathology was semiquantitatively assessed on day +100. Data are expressed as mean 6 SEM. n = 11 (mock), 7 (MCMV IE1 (2)) and (MCMV IE1 (+)), respectively. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0061841.gCMV and GVHDFigure 6. Inflammatory cyto- and chemokine expression in lung, liver and colon: Animals were transplanted as described in Materials and Methods. TNF (A, E, I) IFN-gamma (B, F, J), CXCL1 (C, G, K) and CXCL9 (D, H, L) in organ homogenates were measured by ELISA. Results are shown as mean 6 SEM; n = 11 (mock), 7 MCMV IE1(2) and 7 MCMV IE1(+). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0061841.gis a risk factor for developing this deleterious long-term complication after allogeneic HCT [51]. In summary, our data demonstrate a causal relationship between active replication of CMV in latently infected recipients after allogeneic HCT and the development and aggravation of GVHD. Consequent monitoring for CMV reactivation by quantitative PCR and preemptive treatment in the context of rising viral load are recommended for HCT recipients in the early HCT period, or when.T, despite absent histopathologic findings characteristic for CMV disease in target organs, IE1 gene expression was detectable in the spleen of half of the latently infected allogeneic HCT recipients at time of analysis and that those animals demonstrated more severe GVHD injury than IE-1 negative recipients. Interestingly, organ changes of CMV latently infected but IE-1 negative recipients did not differ from allogeneic non-CMV controls, suggesting that clinically relevant CMV reactivation can be identified by the expression of IE-1, potentially promoting GVHD severity.CMV and GVHDFigure 4. Lung injury after allogeneic HCT. Animals were transplanted as described in Materials and Methods. (A) Lung pathology was semiquantitatively assessed on day +100. Data are expressed as mean 6 SEM. n = 11 (mock), 7 MCMV IE1(2) and MCMV IE1(+), respectively. (B)+(C) Example of histopathological changes (H E stain, magnification: 2006) for (B) mock (normal lung tissue without or with minimal periluminal inflammation around airways and blood vessels, no parenchymal pneumonitis and (C) IE1(+): periluminal inflammation around airways and blood vessels but no major parenchymal pneumonitis. (D ) Total BALF cellularity and CD4+ and CD8+ BAL T cells at day +100 after HCT. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0061841.gPrior studies have demonstrated that lungs and liver are the true sites of MCMV latency and recurrence [47], [14], [26]. Consistently, differences in pulmonary and hepatic, but not colonic pathology were seen in our model. Further, CMV has been associated with the development of obliterative bronchiolitis as a form of lung allograft rejection after solid organ transplan-tation and has been linked to chronic GVHD after HCT, respectively [48] 49]. Pulmonary findings in our model are not characteristic for obliterative bronchiolitis, though they are consistent with changes seen in chronic lung injury of HCT recipients [50], and it is suggestive, that CMV reactivation indeedFigure 5. Hepatic GVHD after allogeneic HCT. Animals were transplanted as described in Materials and Methods. (A) Hepatic GVHD pathology was semiquantitatively assessed on day +100. Data are expressed as mean 6 SEM. n = 11 (mock), 7 (MCMV IE1 (2)) and (MCMV IE1 (+)), respectively. (B ) Example of histopathological changes (H E stain, magnification: 1006) of the liver showing portal tract with moderate lymphocytic inflammation in IE1(+).mock. (D) Colonic GVHD pathology was semiquantitatively assessed on day +100. Data are expressed as mean 6 SEM. n = 11 (mock), 7 (MCMV IE1 (2)) and (MCMV IE1 (+)), respectively. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0061841.gCMV and GVHDFigure 6. Inflammatory cyto- and chemokine expression in lung, liver and colon: Animals were transplanted as described in Materials and Methods. TNF (A, E, I) IFN-gamma (B, F, J), CXCL1 (C, G, K) and CXCL9 (D, H, L) in organ homogenates were measured by ELISA. Results are shown as mean 6 SEM; n = 11 (mock), 7 MCMV IE1(2) and 7 MCMV IE1(+). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0061841.gis a risk factor for developing this deleterious long-term complication after allogeneic HCT [51]. In summary, our data demonstrate a causal relationship between active replication of CMV in latently infected recipients after allogeneic HCT and the development and aggravation of GVHD. Consequent monitoring for CMV reactivation by quantitative PCR and preemptive treatment in the context of rising viral load are recommended for HCT recipients in the early HCT period, or when.

Share this post on:

Author: bet-bromodomain.