Ubjects in each and every group, but considering the risk of loss or incomplete questionnaires, 70 subjects per group had been regarded. Inclusion criteria for all subjects were getting the ability to study and write, and signing the consent kind. Immediately after supplying their informed consent, subjects completed SpannFischer Codependency Scale (SFCS)29 and NEOFive Issue Inventory (NEO-FFI).24 The study employed the SFCS for measuring codependency. This scale is composed of 16 selfreporting items with responses assessed on a sixpoint Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to five (strongly agree). Its items cover 3 dimensions of codependency: (1) maintaining an extreme external locus of control, (2) lacking an open expression of feelings, and (3) applying order, disclaimer and rigor for developing relationships. SFCS scores variety from 16 to 96 with greater scores displaying larger levels of codependency. Internal consistency as measured by Cronbach’s alpha ranges from 0.73 to 0.80. In two administrations of the scale, stability estimations revealed a test-retest correlation of 0.87. The SFCS among other codependency scales located in literature has presented essentially the most reliability and validity proof.30 In this study, Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.81. The NEO-FFI was used to evaluate 5 character traits. It consists of 5 12-item scales created by way of issue analyses as a brief type of the Revised NEO Character Inventory (NEOPI-R) to assess neuroticism (N), extraversion (E), openness (O), agreeableness (A), and conscientiousness (C). The item response adopted a 5-point Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree.five For the reliability of NEO-FFI, Costa and McCrae indicated99 http://ahj.kmu.ac.ir, three AprilCodependency and personality in addicts’ wives Cronbach’s alpha coefficients of 0.86, 0.77, 0.73, 0.68, and 0.81 for N, E, O, A, and C tests respectively. For the present study, Cronbach’s alpha coefficients ranged from 0.70 to 0.87 for the N, E, O, A and C scales. Pearson correlation coefficient, analysis of variances (ANOVA) and several regression analyses have been also conducted.Panaghi et al. Multicollinearity PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19966280 test was performed using the variance inflation aspect to evaluate the correlation among independent variables. The typical for all regression models was close to 1 indicating that multicollinearity was not a problem inside the model. Numerous regression indicated a significant interaction amongst becoming a drug user’s wife and neuroticism ( = 0.23; P 0.05, R2 = 0.03), openness ( = -0.30; P 0.05, R2 = 0.04) and agreeableness ( = -0.29; P 0.01, R2 = 0.05) (Table 3). Just after reviewing the moderating function of personality traits inside the connection in between Imidacloprid living with an addicted man and codependency, character traits of neuroticism, openness and agreeableness were divided into two categories. Thus, folks whose scores have been one normal deviation above the imply had been placed in the high class, and these whose scores had been a single normal deviation under the mean have been placed within the low class. Figures 1 to three show that living with addicted guys predicted codependency amongst women with high neuroticism, low openness and low agreeableness. Amongst girls with low neuroticism, higher openness and high agreeableness, becoming the wife of an addicted did not make a distinction in the degree of codependency.five Codependency four 3 2 1 Non-Drug-users’ wives Drug-users’ wives Figure 1. In one study no considerable distinction amongst wives of alcoholic m.